President Donald Trump’s legal allies have launched a flurry of lawsuits arguing that widespread fraud could have been committed because its pollers didn’t get proper access to the voting process. Most of those lawsuits have been dismissed over lack of evidence of election fraud.
Trump has tried to argue that there is a link between some of the complaints of partisan pollers and the results of the election. But till now, he has been unable to validate his assertions.
Who is a poller?
A poller is a partisan appointee who monitors voting or ballot counting to help ensure their party gets a fair shot. They are not supposed to interfere in the electoral process, except to report issues to party officials or polling place authorities, and are typically required to register in advance with the local election office. Pollers are designated by a political party or campaign to report any concerns that they may have. Monitoring polling places and election offices is allowed in most states, but rules vary and there are certain limits to avoid any harassment or intimidation.
Were Trump’s pollers denied access?
The Trump campaign said from the beginning that republican pollers were being improperly denied access to observe the counting of ballots. But election officials in key battleground states said that rules were being followed and they were committed to transparency. In Pennsylvania, for example, state election officials said pollers were certified in every county. Even republican lawyers acknowledged in court that they had observersing polls and mail-in ballots being processed. In Michigan, a Trump campaign lawsuit included assertions from their observers that poll workers rolled their eyes when viewing votes for Trump, wore masks or clothing supporting the Black Lives Matter movement or appeared to double-count ballots. Other lawsuits claimed pollers were temporarily denied access in some locations, but there has been no evidence to back it up.
Was there any voter fraud in the elections then?
The federal cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency has called the voting and count “the most secure in American history.” But Trump’s legal allies continue to argue without any evidence that their poll workers weren’t on hand and anything could have happened out of their view.